We subjected the Samsung Galaxy S22 + (Exynos) to our rigorous SBMARK battery test suite to measure its performance in terms of range, charge and efficiency. In these test results, we will analyze how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.
Overview
Key specs:
- Battery capacity: 4500mAh
- 45W charger (not included)
- Wireless charging – 15W
- 6.6 inch 1080 x 2340, 120Hz OLED display
- Samsung Exynos 2200 chipset (4 nm).
- ROM / RAM combination tested: 128GB + 8GB
Pros
- Excellent charging efficiency
- Decent performance when streaming videos
Cons
- Weak performance when gaming, calling and using GPS
- Loses 5% every night during TUS
- The autonomy collapses when it reaches 5% of the battery
- Poor wireless charging experience
The Samsung Galaxy S22 + (Exynos) comes with a 4500mAh battery, slightly smaller than the Ultra’s 5000mAh, but that slight difference certainly had an impact on the S22 + ‘s range. While there are areas where battery performance was good, it couldn’t do 2 days of battery life with moderate use. A new 45W charger helped the device score 2 points in the overall battery score, but the time gained by the charger was disappointing – there was only 5 minutes of gain for a full charge with the 45W charger, compared to the 25 W charger. The S22 + (Exynos) battery was efficient, slightly above average, with an excellent charging score.
Comparing the S22 + (Exynos) battery with others in the ultra premium segment, the device does not fare well, coming almost last, just like in the global ranking. The Galaxy S22 + (Exynos) charge score is the strong point here, coming in slightly above average in our global ranking, thanks to a decent secondary full charge score.
Test summary
About SBMARK Battery Tests: For the score and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, SBMARK engineers perform a series of objective tests over a period of one week both indoors and outdoors. This article highlights the most important results of our tests. (See our introductory article and how we test articles for more details on our Smartphone Battery Protocol.)
The table below shows the battery capacity, charger tested, display type and resolution, and processor specifications for the compared devices.
Drums | Battery charger | wireless | Screen | Processor | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy S22 + (Exynos) | 4500 mAh | 45 W (not included) |
15W | OLED 1080 x 2340 |
Samsung Exynos 2200 |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro | 3095 mAh | 20 W (not included) |
15W | OLED 1170 x 2532 |
Apple A15 Bionic |
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra | 5000 mAh | 67W (not included) |
67W | OLED 1440 x 3200 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G |
Autonomy
45
Samsung Galaxy S22 + (Exynos)
98
Wiko Power U30
Wiko Power U30
How the autonomy score is composed
The range score is made up of three performance sub-scores: stationary, moving, and calibrated use cases. Each sub-score includes the results of a full range of tests to measure autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.
57 hours
Light use
Active: 2h30 / day
40 hours
Moderate use
Active: 4 hours a day
25h
Intense use
Active: 7 hours a day
Stationary
42
Samsung Galaxy S22 + (Exynos)
104
Viva Y72 5G
Viva Y72 5G
A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a series of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical use scenario” (TUS) – making calls, streaming video, etc. – 4 hours of active use over a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep”. The robot repeats this series of actions every day until the device is discharged.
In movement
56
Samsung Galaxy S22 + (Exynos)
96
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
Using a smartphone on the go puts a strain on autonomy due to additional “hidden” requests, such as the continuous signaling associated with the selection of the cell phone network. SBMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a well-defined set of activities following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway …) for each device
Calibrated
55
Samsung Galaxy S22 + (Exynos)
100
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and ours robots repeatedly perform actions related to a specific use case (such as games, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting at an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have consumed at least 5% of the battery charge.
Reload
81
Samsung Galaxy S22 + (Exynos)
117
Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
How the Charge score is composed
Charging is completely part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where battery life is minimal, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a problem. The SBMARK battery charge score consists of two secondary scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.
Full charge
87
Samsung Galaxy S22 + (Exynos)
117
Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
Full charge tests evaluate the reliability of the battery charge indicator; measure how long and how much energy the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, 80 to 100% as shown by the user interface, and up to an actual full charge.
The charging curves, in wired and wireless mode (if available) show the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the energy consumption in watts during the charging phases towards full capacity.
Fast thrust
72
Samsung Galaxy S22 + (Exynos)
109
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Xiaomi 11T Pro
With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The graph here compares the average runtime gain from a 5 minute quick charge.
Efficiency
65
Samsung Galaxy S22 + (Exynos)
102
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
How the efficiency score is composed
The SBMARK energy efficiency score consists of two secondary scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, which combine both data obtained during a typical use scenario based on robots, calibrated tests and charge evaluation, taking into account the battery capacity of the device . SBMARK calculates the annual energy consumption of the product, shown in the graph below, which is representative of the overall efficiency during charging and in use.
The secondary charge score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, relative to the amount of energy needed to fill the battery versus the energy the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to the phone; the residual consumption when the phone is fully charged and still connected to the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The graph below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in%.
Discharge
60
Samsung Galaxy S22 + (Exynos)
121
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
The discharge secondary score evaluates the discharge rate of a battery during a test, which is independent of the battery capacity. It is the ratio of the capacity of a battery divided by its autonomy. A small capacity battery may have the same runtime as a large capacity battery, indicating that the device is well optimized, with a low discharge rate.
Start a new Thread