We put the Google Pixel Fold through our rigorous SBMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in terms of photo, video and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article analyzes how the device performed in a variety of tests and several common use cases and aims to highlight the most important results of our tests with an excerpt of the data captured.
Overview
Main camera specs:
- Main: 48MP sensor, 0.8μm pixel, f/1.7 aperture lens, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS
- Ultra wide angle: 10.8 MP sensor, 1.25 μm pixels, f/2.2 aperture lens, AF, OIS
- Telephoto: 10.8MP sensor, 1.22μm pixel, f/3.05 aperture lens, Dual Pixel AF, OIS
Pros
- Good exposure in most conditions
- Good dynamic range and neutral white balance in indoor and outdoor photos
- Effective video stabilization
- Fast, accurate autofocus and no shutter lag ensure quick captures
Against
- Video exposure and white balance instability
- Fairly loud subject noise levels in backlit and low light conditions
- Loss of detail in low light conditions
- Depth estimation errors and unpleasant blur gradient in bokeh mode
- Unwanted image artifacts, including ghosting, blending artifacts, and flickering
The Google Pixel Fold delivered average performance for a device in the Ultra Premium segment in our SBMARK Camera test, but stood out as the best device in a foldable or flip-up form factor we’ve tested to date. Its main selling point was the autofocus system, which delivered precise focus most of the time, even in difficult lighting conditions. Both photos and videos captured with the device featured a wide dynamic range and neutral white balance. Furthermore, contrast was rendered well in HDR conditions, for example in backlit scenes, and exposure was generally good in most situations. The camera also managed to keep noise levels low in bright light and indoors.
However, noise levels increased in low light, night shots and high contrast scenes. Portrait mode also left room for improvement, with a slightly nasty gradient blur and noticeable depth estimation artifacts. Video clips showed exposure and white balance instability under all conditions. Overall, the Google Pixel Fold was best suited for capturing landscape shots in most lighting conditions.
Trial summary
About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK’s camera evaluations are conducted in labs and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests for which results are calculated directly by the measurement software on our lab setups and perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of metrics allows a panel of image experts to compare aspects of quality of the image that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, zoom, and video quality are rated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras from different devices. For more information on the SBMARK camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section compiles the key elements of SBMARK’s exhaustive testing and analysis. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us on how to receive a full report.
Google Pixel Fold camera scores compared to Ultra-Premium
This graph compares the SBMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.
Photo
137
Huawei P60Pro
Huawei P60Pro
SBMARK camera photo test information
For scoring and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes using camera presets. The photographic protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portrait, family and landscape photography. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and by performing objective measurements on laboratory-acquired graph images under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300 K to 6,500 K.
In our tests, the Google Pixel Fold delivered the best still performance to date for a device with a foldable form factor. Our experts liked the way exposure was handled in challenging conditions, such as backlit or high-contrast scenes. Thanks to a wide dynamic range, clipping of highlights has been minimized. Color rendition and skin tones were also pleasing, but the highlight of the device was the autofocus. The zero shutter lag allowed for fast acquisition, and focus accuracy was high, even in low-light conditions.
On the downside, low-light noise levels, especially on moving subjects, were higher than on other foldable phones we’ve tested. The retention of the storyline was on a similar level to that of direct competitors.
Google Pixel Fold Photo vs Ultra-Premium scores
Photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture and noise under various lighting conditions. Autofocus performance and the presence of artifacts are also evaluated on all images acquired under controlled laboratory conditions and on real-life images. All of these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help you understand the main strengths and weaknesses of the camera.
Exposure
110
Huawei P60Pro
Huawei P60Pro
Color
110
Huawei P60Pro
Huawei P60Pro
Exposure and color are key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject across various use cases such as landscape, portrait or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in light and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when taking multiple images of the same scene.
For color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. With regards to color rendition and skin tone, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of color signature.
Google Pixel Fold: Beautiful skin tones, natural exposure
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 – Slightly unnatural skin tones, good exposure
Oppo Find N2 Flip – Slightly inaccurate skin tones, slight highlight clipping
Auto focus
110
Huawei P60Pro
Huawei P60Pro
Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag, and depth of field. Shutter lag is the difference between when the user presses the capture button and when the image is actually taken. It includes the speed of focusing and the ability of the device to capture images at the right moment, the so-called “zero shutter lag” capability. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for a single-subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions like group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and low-light to outdoor conditions.
Autofocus irregularity and speed: 5Lux Δ0EV Tungsten Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed, and also zero shutter lag capability by showing edge acuity versus shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup over a series of images. All photos were taken at 5Lux with tungsten illuminant, 500ms after blurring. Edge sharpness is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves graph and shooting time is measured on the Universal Timer LED.
Structure
102
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images taken in the lab as well as real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the light and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on map images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels for Tripod and Handheld Conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Retention of Detail score with lux level, for two sealing conditions. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-powered metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendition on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.
Noise
88
Honor Magic5 Pro
Honor Magic5 Pro
Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real-life images and images of graphs captured in the lab. For natural images, special attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on chart images captured under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The graph used is the dead leaves graph and standardized measurement such as visual noise derived from ISO 15739.
Evolution of visual noise with illuminance levels in portable conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with lux level under palmar conditions. The Visual Noise metric is the average of the Visual Noise measurement across all patches of the Dead Leaves graph in the AFHDR configuration. The SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.
Artifacts
77
Google Pixel 6
Google Pixel 6
Artifact assessment examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, ringing edges, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color tone shifts, among other types of possible effects unnatural on photos. The more serious and frequent the artifact, the greater the deduction of points from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding loss of points are listed below.
Major penalties for photographic artifacts
Preview
63
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
The preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app’s image preview, with particular attention to the difference between the capture and the preview, especially regarding the dynamic range and the application of the bokeh effect. The uniformity of exposure, color and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimum to the maximum available zoom factor is also evaluated. The preview frame rate is measured using the Universal Timer LED.
Google Pixel Fold – Preview – Lower contrast and darker exposure than the capture
Google Pixel Fold – Capture
Zoom in
117
Huawei P60Pro
Huawei P60Pro
About SBMARK Camera Zoom Tests
SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor, and low-light scenes using camera presets and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long zoom. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and by performing objective measurements of lab-captured map images under varying conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.
The Google Pixel Fold has the best zoom of all foldable or foldable devices we’ve tested. Indeed, a high-quality zoom requires several dedicated cameras, which can lead to component clutter. But the Google Pixel Fold managed to push the limits of its form factor with a well-performing zoom. Thus, the camera offered good texture retention at medium and long ranges. Color rendition was nice and exposure was good. However, with a minimum equivalent focal length of 16mm, the field of view of the Google Pixel Fold’s ultra-wide camera was quite narrow compared to best-in-class devices, but at a similar level to other foldable phones. However, the Google Pixel Fold is a great foldable device for photographers who prefer to zoom in rather than zoom out.
Google Pixel Fold Zoom vs Ultra-Premium scores
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in focal length equivalent to 35mm. Zoomed scores appear on the right and zoomed scores on the left.
Wide
55
Huawei P60Pro
Huawei P60Pro
These tests analyze the performance of the ultra wide angle camera at different focal lengths from 12mm to 20mm. All attributes of image quality are evaluated, with particular attention to artifacts such as chromatic aberrations, lens softness and distortion. The images below are an excerpt from the tested scenes.
Google Pixel Fold – Ultra wide
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 – Ultra wide
Oppo Find N2 Flip – Ultra wide
tele
104
Huawei P60Pro
Huawei P60Pro
All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40mm to 300mm, with an emphasis on texture and detail. The score comes from a series of objective laboratory measurements and perceptual analysis of real-life images.
SBMARK CHART Detail Retention Score (DMC) by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
SBMARK CHART Detail Retention Score (DMC) by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
SBMARK CHART Detail Retention Score (DMC) by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
SBMARK CHART Detail Retention Score (DMC) by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
video
131
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
About SBMARK Camera Video Tests
SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and low natural light scenes, indoors and out, using the camera’s default settings. Evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural video taken under various conditions and performing objective measurements on lab-recorded graph video under various conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.
In video mode, the Google Pixel Fold was tested at 4K resolution and 30 frames per second. Overall, video performance was the best of any foldable phone tested to date. Target exposure was pretty accurate, but our testers observed low contrast at times. Video noise was well under control in bright light and typical indoor conditions, but noise could appear in low light. The autofocus system worked accurately, with no noticeable failures. Also, the video stabilization worked effectively, keeping camera shake at bay.
Not everything was perfect, though. Our testers found that texture retention left room for improvement, especially when texture artifacts such as scene integrity appeared. The color may also be unstable under some conditions, but the overall color rendition was natural.
Google Pixel Fold video scores compared to Ultra-Premium
Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as still images, such as exposure, color, texture or noise, as well as temporal aspects such as speed, exposure uniformity and stability, white balance and autofocus transitions.
Exposure
107
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Color
100
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in light and dark areas of the image. The stability and temporal adaptation of the exposure are also analysed.
Image quality color analysis examines color rendition, skin tone rendition, white balance, color shading, white balance stability and its adaptation when the light changes.
Google Pixel Fold: good exposure, smooth exposure transitions, slightly warm but acceptable color
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 – Slight underexposure, slight exposure transition issues, slightly washed out colors
Oppo Find N2 Flip: Slight underexposure, exposure transition issues, accurate colors
Structure
86
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real-life videos as well as graphics videos recorded in the lab. Natural video recordings are evaluated visually, with particular attention to the level of detail in bright areas and dark areas. Objective measurements of card images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux are performed. The charts used are the SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.
Google Pixel Fold – DxOMark 1000 lux chart
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold – DxOMark 1000 lux chart
Oppo Find N2 Flip – DxOMark 1000 lux chart
SBMARK CHART (DMC) video score for detail retention versus lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the video DMC detail retention score with the level of lux in the video. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-powered metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendition on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.
Noise
107
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real-life video recording and graph videos taken in the lab. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with an emphasis on noise in dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on graph videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graph used is the SBMARK visual noise graph.
Evolution of spatial visual noise with level of illumination
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with lux level. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise table in the video noise setup. The SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.
Time evolution of visual noise with level of illumination
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise over time with lux level. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise table in the video noise configuration.
Stabilization
113
Huawei P60Pro
Huawei P60Pro
The stabilization rating tests the device’s ability to stabilize footage using software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any other means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, yellow artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running use cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt from one of the tested scenes.
Google Pixel Fold: Steady footage when walking, slight camera shake when running while recording
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 – Steady shooting when walking, slight camera shake when running while recording
Oppo Find N2 Flip – Stable shooting when walking, camera shake when running while recording
Artifacts
79
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR graph in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the Universal Timer LED. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying close attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and pitch shifting, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the more points will be deducted from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.
Top penalties for video artifacts
Start a new Thread