We subjected the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 to our rigorous suite of SBMARK Camera tests to measure its performance in terms of photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article takes a closer look at how the device fared across a range of tests and several common use cases, and aims to highlight the most important results from our tests with an excerpt of the captured data.

Overview

Camera Key Specifications:

  • Primary: 50MP sensor, f/1.8 aperture lens, 1.0µm pixels, Dual Pixel AF, OIS, FOV 85°
  • Ultra-wide angle: 12MP sensor, f/2.2 aperture lens, 1.12µm pixels, FOV 123°

Pros

  • Good exposure, nice contrast and wide dynamic range in photos and videos
  • Fairly good detail in bright light conditions
  • Good video details in most conditions in photo and video
  • Nice color in the video
  • Effective video stabilization

Against

  • Lack of detail in telezoom shots
  • Artifacts around subjects in bokeh mode
  • Exposure and color instability in videos
  • Noise indoors and in low light conditions
  • Occasional autofocus errors
  • Occasional white balance and inaccurate color rendition

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 delivered a decent performance in our SBMARK Camera tests, but it failed to match the best conventional non-foldable devices in its price segment. Overall results for photos, videos, and the ultra-wide camera were close to those of the more expensive Galaxy Z Fold6. However, the lack of a dedicated telephoto camera meant that the Galaxy Z Flip6 couldn’t keep up with its larger cousin in terms of telephoto zoom. Results were also slightly lower in bokeh mode, for which the Z Fold6 uses its telephoto module.

The Z Flip6 is a fairly modest upgrade over its predecessor, the Z Flip5, in terms of camera hardware. However, Samsung engineers have focused on tweaking the camera software to improve image quality and performance. This was most noticeable in the zoom category, but also in the preview image displayed in the camera app before shooting.

Test summary

About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK camera ratings are conducted in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests where results are calculated directly from measurement software on our laboratory setups, and perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of parameters allows a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. A smartphone test involves a team of engineers and technicians for approximately one week. Photo, zoom and video quality are evaluated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras in different devices. For more information on the SBMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section summarizes key elements of SBMARK’s comprehensive testing and analysis. Full performance ratings are available upon request. Contact us to learn how to receive a full report.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Camera Scores vs. Ultra-Premium

This chart compares SBMARK scores for photo, zoom and video between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores for the price segment are also shown. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.

Photo

132

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

About SBMARK Camera Photo Tests

For evaluation and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor and low-light scenes, using default camera settings. The photographic protocol is designed to account for key use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portrait, family and landscape photography. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and performing objective measurements on chart images captured in the laboratory under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

The Galaxy Z Flip 6’s photography performance is nearly identical to that of the Z Fold6, the other high-end device with a foldable form factor in Samsung’s smartphone lineup. Overall still image quality was good, especially exposure and color. Thanks to the HDR format, the camera was also able to produce nice contrast in our tests, especially when shooting in bright or typical indoor conditions. On the other hand, image noise was noticeable indoors and in low light, and our testers observed some autofocus errors.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Photo Scores vs. Ultra-Premium

Photographic tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise under various lighting conditions. Autofocus performance and artifacts are also evaluated on all images captured under controlled laboratory conditions and in real-world images. All of these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the main strengths and weaknesses of the camera.

Exposure

110

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Color

111

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the primary attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject across various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, such as the ability to render details in both the bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when taking multiple images of the same scene.
For color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin tone rendition, white balance, color hue, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendition, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of color signature.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 – Natural skin tones, good exposure and contrast

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 – Similar to the Z Flip6 in display and color

Google Pixel Fold – Good exposure and color

Auto focus

97

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag, and depth of field. Shutter lag is the difference between when the user presses the capture button and when the image is actually taken. It includes the speed of focusing and the ability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called “zero shutter lag” capability. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for a single subject portrait or a close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; both are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-world images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low-light conditions to outdoors.

Autofocus speed and irregularity: 1000Lux Δ7EV Handheld daylight

This graph illustrates the accuracy and speed of focusing as well as the zero shutter lag capability by showing edge sharpness versus shutter speed measured on the AFHDR setup over a series of images. All images were shot at 1000 Lux with Daylight illuminant, 500 ms after blurring. In this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and an 18% reflective gray patch is 7, which we denote by an exposure value difference of 7. Edge sharpness is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves graph and shutter speed is measured on the Universal Timer LED.

Structure

109

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images shot in the lab and in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels for Tripod and Handheld Conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention Score with lux level, for two holding conditions. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendering on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

84

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real images and chart images taken in the laboratory. For natural images, special attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the measurement standardized as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.

Evolution of visual noise with illuminance levels in portable conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with lux level in handheld conditions. The visual noise metric is the average of the visual noise measurement across all Dead Leaves plot patches in the AFHDR configuration. The SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Artifacts

73

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

Artifact grading examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, edge ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color shifts, among other types of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the higher the points deducted from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding loss of points are listed below.

Penalty for main photo artifacts

Blurry

70

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Bokeh is tested in a dedicated mode, usually portrait mode or aperture, and analyzed by visually inspecting all images captured in the lab and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce a portrait photograph comparable to that taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes that are paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur reflectors. Portrait image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 – Slight depth estimation artifacts around subject

Preview

76

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app’s image preview, with a focus on the difference between capture and preview, particularly with respect to dynamic range and the application of bokeh. The smoothness of exposure, color, and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimum to the maximum zoom factor available is also evaluated. Preview frame rate is measured using the LED Universal Timer.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 – Preview – Very similar to the final capture

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 – Capture

Enlarge

124

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

About SBMARK Camera Zoom Tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and in natural outdoor, indoor and low-light scenes, using camera presets and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra-wide to ultra-long range zoom. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and by performing objective measurements of lab-captured chart images under various conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

While the Z Flip6’s telephoto zoom performance wasn’t on par with the telephoto-equipped Galaxy S24 or Galaxy Z Fold6, it was still decent for a device that doesn’t have a dedicated telephoto module. In particular, the level of detail in the captured image dropped significantly at equivalent focal length settings above 100mm. The Z Flip6’s telephoto performance was also below average for the price segment.

The ultra-wide produced very similar results to the Z Fold6, offering a good user experience.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 zoom scores vs. ultra-premium

This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The x-axis is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zoom in scores are displayed on the right and zoom out scores on the left.

Wide

99

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide-angle camera at different focal lengths from 12mm to 20mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention to artifacts such as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. The images below are an excerpt of tested scenes.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 – Very wide field of view, nice colors and exposure but lacks fine details

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 – Same render as Galaxy Z Flip6

Google Pixel Fold – Slightly narrower field of view, nice exposure and color

TV

91

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40mm to 300mm, with particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a series of objective laboratory measurements and perceptual analysis of real images.

SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.

SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.

SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.

SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.

Video

128

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

About SBMARK Camera Video Tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled laboratory environments and natural low-light scenes, indoors and outdoors, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural video captured under various conditions and performing objective measurements on lab-recorded chart videos under various conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

In our tests, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 delivered pretty good video quality in most recording conditions, thanks to the HDR format providing a wide dynamic range, good exposure, and vivid colors. As with the Z Fold6, color casts could be noticeable, especially when recording in warm, low-light conditions. These color casts also affected the rendering of skin tones. The autofocus system worked quickly and accurately in video mode, and footage showed fairly high levels of detail. However, noise could be noticeable in low-light recordings. Our testers also observed instability in exposure, color, and autofocus, as well as issues with transitions in changing scenes. Video stabilization worked well when standing still during recording, but could react a little sharply when the camera was shaking.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Video Scores vs Ultra-Premium

Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, as well as temporal aspects such as speed, smoothness, and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

97

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Color

90

Honor Magic6 Pro

Honor Magic6 Pro

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, i.e. the ability to make details visible in both the bright and dark areas of the image. Exposure stability and temporal adaptation are also analyzed.
Image quality color analysis examines color rendition, skin tone rendition, white balance, color hue, white balance stability and its adaptation to changing light.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 – Accurate exposure, nice colors, good details, minor exposure instabilities

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 – Rendering identical to the Galaxy Z Flip6

Google Pixel Fold – Slight loss of detail, stable exposure

Structure

104

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real videos and laboratory-recorded graphic videos. Natural video recordings are evaluated visually, with particular attention to the level of detail in bright and dark areas. Objective measurements are performed on graphic images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graphs used are the SBMARK (DMC) graph and the Dead Leaves graph.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) Video Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Preservation video score with the level of lux in the video. The DMC Detail Preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the rendering of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

104

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real video recordings and lab-shot chart videos. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with special attention to noise in dark areas and under high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on chart videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the SBMARK Visual Noise Chart.

Evolution of spatial visual noise with the illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with lux level. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise configuration. The SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Temporal evolution of visual noise with the level of illumination

This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with lux level. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise configuration.

Stabilization

114

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Stabilization rating tests the device’s ability to stabilize footage using software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any other means. The rating looks at residual motion, smoothness, yellow artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running usage cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt from one of the scenes tested.

Artifacts

81

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are evaluated visually with special attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the higher the points deducted from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Penalty for major video artifacts

Let's talk about "Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 Camera test" with our community!
Start a new Thread

Philip Owell

Professional blogger, here to bring you new and interesting content every time you visit our blog.