We put the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 through our rigorous suite of SBMARK Camera tests to measure its performance in terms of photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article takes a closer look at how the device fared across a range of tests and common use cases, and aims to highlight the key results from our tests with an excerpt of the captured data.
Overview
Camera Key Specifications:
- Primary: 50MP sensor, 1.0µm pixels, 23mm-equivalent f/1.8 aperture lens, dual-pixel PDAF, OIS
- Ultra-wide angle: 12MP sensor, 1.12µm pixels, 12mm equivalent f/2.2 aperture lens
- Telephoto: 10MP sensor, 1.0µm pixels, 66mm equivalent f/2.4 aperture lens, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
Pros
- Good exposure and fairly wide dynamic range
- Fairly good detail and low noise in bright light conditions
- Decent details in long range telephoto shots
- Good depth estimation in bokeh shots
- Mostly accurate video exposure with wide dynamic range
- Good video detail in most conditions
- Nice color in the video
- Effective video stabilization, especially when recording while still
Against
- Some luminance and chroma noise indoors and in low light conditions
- Autofocus errors in low light conditions
- Occasional white balance and inaccurate color rendition
- Luminance noise in ultra-wide shots
- Underexposed subjects in night shots with flash off
- Exposure and color instability in videos
- Autofocus and refocusing unstable in video mode
- High levels of video noise, especially in low light conditions
- Some video artifacts, including ringing and color quantization
The Galaxy Z Fold6 is Samsung’s latest foldable device in the Ultra Premium segment. Previous generations of Galaxy Z Fold devices lagged slightly behind their Samsung Galaxy S series counterparts in terms of camera performance. With this latest model, the South Korean manufacturer has made an effort to bridge the gap by adding a 3x optical telephoto zoom camera to the mix.
In SBMARK Camera tests, the Z Fold6 scored well for a foldable, performing well in both the photo and video categories. However, at its price, the best conventional non-foldable smartphones still offer better still and video quality.
Test summary
About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK camera ratings are conducted in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests where results are calculated directly from measurement software on our laboratory setups, and perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of parameters allows a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. A smartphone test involves a team of engineers and technicians for approximately one week. Photo, zoom and video quality are evaluated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras in different devices. For more information on the SBMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section summarizes key elements of SBMARK’s comprehensive testing and analysis. Full performance ratings are available upon request. Contact us to learn how to receive a full report.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Camera Scores vs. Ultra-Premium
This chart compares SBMARK scores for photo, zoom and video between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores for the price segment are also shown. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.
Photo
132
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
About SBMARK Camera Photo Tests
For evaluation and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor and low-light scenes, using default camera settings. The photographic protocol is designed to account for key use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portrait, family and landscape photography. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and performing objective measurements on chart images captured in the laboratory under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.
In our tests, the Galaxy Z Fold6’s photography performance was close to that of its predecessor, the Z Fold5, but our testers noticed improvements in a few areas. Exposure was generally accurate, but subjects could be underexposed in backlit scenes. Slight white balance nuances could occasionally be apparent, and the Z Fold6 failed to match the best-in-class devices in the noise category. Additionally, our testers observed some autofocus instability.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Photo Scores vs. Ultra-Premium
Exposure
110
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Color
114
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the primary attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject across various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, such as the ability to render details in both the bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when taking multiple images of the same scene.
For color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin tone rendition, white balance, color hue, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendition, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of color signature.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 – Slight underexposure but wide dynamic range
Google Pixel Fold – Good exposure but highlight clipping
Auto focus
101
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag, and depth of field. Shutter lag is the difference between when the user presses the capture button and when the image is actually taken. It includes the speed of focusing and the ability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called “zero shutter lag” capability. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for a single subject portrait or a close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; both are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-world images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low-light conditions to outdoors.
Autofocus speed and irregularity: 1000Lux Δ7EV Handheld daylight
Structure
107
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images shot in the lab and in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels for Tripod and Handheld Conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention Score with lux level, for two holding conditions. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendering on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.
Noise
85
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real images and chart images taken in the laboratory. For natural images, special attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the measurement standardized as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.
Evolution of visual noise with illuminance levels in portable conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with lux level in handheld conditions. The visual noise metric is the average of the visual noise measurement across all Dead Leaves plot patches in the AFHDR configuration. The SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.
Artifacts
71
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
Artifact grading examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, edge ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color shifts, among other types of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the higher the points deducted from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding loss of points are listed below.
Penalty for main photo artifacts
Blurry
75
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Bokeh is tested in a dedicated mode, usually portrait mode or aperture, and analyzed by visually inspecting all images captured in the lab and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce a portrait photograph comparable to that taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes that are paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur reflectors. Portrait image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 – Accurate depth estimation and a fairly natural bokeh effect
Preview
71
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app’s image preview, with a focus on the difference between capture and preview, particularly with respect to dynamic range and the application of bokeh. The smoothness of exposure, color, and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimum to the maximum zoom factor available is also evaluated. Preview frame rate is measured using the LED Universal Timer.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 – Preview – More limited dynamic range in preview than final capture
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 – Capture
Enlarge
135
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
About SBMARK Camera Zoom Tests
SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and in natural outdoor, indoor and low-light scenes, using camera presets and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra-wide to ultra-long range zoom. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and by performing objective measurements of lab-captured chart images under various conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.
Higher noise levels and some white balance nuances meant the Z Fold6’s ultra-wide camera performed slightly worse than its predecessor, the Z Fold5. However, the overall experience when shooting with the ultra-wide was good. The telephoto zoom, on the other hand, has been significantly improved, with better overall quality, especially at long-range settings. The telephoto performance was among the best for a foldable, but still behind the best non-foldables in the ultra premium segment.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Zoom Scores Versus Ultra-Premium
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The x-axis is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zoom in scores are displayed on the right and zoom out scores on the left.
Wide
101
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide-angle camera at different focal lengths from 12mm to 20mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention to artifacts such as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. The images below are an excerpt of tested scenes.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 – Good details but unnatural fine detail rendering
Samsung Galaxy ZFold5 – Lack of details
Google Pixel Fold – Good details with well-rendered fine details
TV
102
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40mm to 300mm, with particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a series of objective laboratory measurements and perceptual analysis of real images.
SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length
SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
video
128
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
About SBMARK Camera Video Tests
SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled laboratory environments and natural low-light scenes, indoors and outdoors, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural video captured under various conditions and performing objective measurements on lab-recorded chart videos under various conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.
In our tests, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 delivered solid video quality in most conditions. The HDR format ensured a wide dynamic range, with accurate on-target exposure and vivid colors. On the other hand, our testers noted frequent color casts, particularly warm casts in low-light conditions, which also had a negative impact on skin tone rendition. The autofocus system worked quickly and accurately, and the camera recorded decent levels of detail in most lighting conditions. However, video noise was evident when recording in low-light conditions. The main areas for improvement included instability in exposure, color, and autofocus, and issues adapting to scene changes. Video stabilization was very effective when standing still during recording, but could be a little harsh when shooting while moving.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Ultra-Premium Video Scores
Exposure
97
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Color
90
Honor Magic6 Pro
Honor Magic6 Pro
Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, i.e. the ability to make details visible in both the bright and dark areas of the image. Exposure stability and temporal adaptation are also analyzed.
Image quality color analysis examines color rendition, skin tone rendition, white balance, color hue, white balance stability and its adaptation to changing light.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 – Good exposure, nice colors, slight instabilities in adaptation and autofocus
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 – Good exposure, nice colors, minor adjustment issues
Google Pixel Fold – Good exposure, nice colors, minor adjustment issues
Structure
105
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real videos and laboratory-recorded graphic videos. Natural video recordings are evaluated visually, with particular attention to the level of detail in bright and dark areas. Objective measurements are performed on graphic images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graphs used are the SBMARK (DMC) graph and the Dead Leaves graph.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) Video Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Preservation video score with the level of lux in the video. The DMC Detail Preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the rendering of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.
Noise
104
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real video recordings and lab-shot chart videos. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with special attention to noise in dark areas and under high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on chart videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the SBMARK Visual Noise Chart.
Evolution of spatial visual noise with the illuminance level
Temporal evolution of visual noise with the level of illumination
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with lux level. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise configuration.
Stabilization
114
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Stabilization rating tests the device’s ability to stabilize footage using software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any other means. The rating looks at residual motion, smoothness, yellow artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running usage cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt from one of the scenes tested.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 – Stabilization quite effective
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 – Stabilization is quite effective
Google Pixel Fold – Good stabilization but some camera shake still noticeable
Artifacts
81
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are evaluated visually with special attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the higher the points deducted from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.
Penalty for major video artifacts
Start a new Thread