We subjected the Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon) to our rigorous SBMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in terms of photo, video and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article analyzes how the device performed in a variety of tests and several common use cases and aims to highlight the most important results of our tests with an excerpt of the data captured.
Overview
Main camera specs:
- Main: 50MP sensor, f/1.57 aperture lens
- Ultra wide angle: 48MP sensor, f/2.2 aperture lens
- Tele 2x: 12MP sensor, f/1.85 aperture lens
- Tele 5x: 8MP sensor, f/3.4 aperture lens
Pros
- Wide dynamic range in most scenes
- Good consistency in low-light portraits
- Fairly good face exposure, even in high-contrast night scenes
- Accurate and stable video exposure
- Stable video color
- Fast and accurate video autofocus
Versus
- Ghosting artifacts and halos in challenging high-contrast scenes
- Unstable exposure in low light conditions and indoors
- Occasional loss of detail in bright light and indoor portraits
- Luminance noise in all lighting conditions for video
- Highlights cutouts in high contrast video scenes
In our tests, the Vivo X80 Pro delivered good overall camera performance, securing its place in the upper regions of the SBMARK camera rankings. When shooting still images, the device’s main selling points were its good color rendition and accurate facial exposure, as well as a good texture/noise trade-off in low-light conditions. The Vivo did well for zooming too, with nice colors on the ultra-wide camera and decent detail when zooming into the distance. Video clips showed stable exposure and color, as well as fast and accurate autofocus performance.
Trial summary
About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK’s camera evaluations are conducted in labs and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests for which results are calculated directly by the measurement software on our lab setups and perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of metrics allows a panel of image experts to compare aspects of quality of the image that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, zoom, and video quality are rated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras from different devices. For more information on the SBMARK camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section compiles the key elements of SBMARK’s exhaustive testing and analysis. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us on how to receive a full report.
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon) camera scores versus Ultra-Premium
This graph compares the SBMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.
Photo
139
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
152
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
SBMARK camera photo test information
For scoring and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes using camera presets. The photographic protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portrait, family and landscape photography. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and by performing objective measurements on laboratory-acquired graph images under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300 K to 6,500 K.
In photo mode, the Vivo produced accurate facial exposure when capturing portraits in most lighting conditions, even at night, but our testers also found exposure to be occasionally wonky on backlit subjects. The camera rendered nice textures in low-light portraits and was able to capture some nice contrast. On the downside, we saw haloing and ghosting in high-contrast scenes and an occasional loss of detail in bright light and indoor portraits.
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon) Photo Scores vs Ultra-Premium
Photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture and noise under various lighting conditions. Autofocus performance and the presence of artifacts are also evaluated on all images acquired under controlled laboratory conditions and on real-life images. All of these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help you understand the main strengths and weaknesses of the camera.
Exposure
109
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
117
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Color
107
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
119
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Exposure and color are key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject across various use cases such as landscape, portrait or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in light and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when taking multiple images of the same scene.
For color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. With regards to color rendition and skin tone, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of color signature.
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon): Precise exposure of the target, but a halo artifact is noticeable
Xiaomi 12S Ultra: Accurate target exposure but limited dynamic range and reddish skin tones on the close-up model
Honor Magic 4 Ultimate – precise exposure of the target and beautiful colors
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon) – nice exposure and contrast, with warm white balance in low light
Xiaomi 12S Ultra – Accurate target exposure with beautiful colors
Honor Magic 4 Ultimate: Accurate target exposure, cooler white balance
Auto focus
97
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
116
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag, and depth of field. Shutter lag is the difference between when the user presses the capture button and when the image is actually taken. It includes the speed of focusing and the ability of the device to capture images at the right moment, the so-called “zero shutter lag” capability. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for a single-subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and low-light to outdoor conditions.
Autofocus Ruggedness and Speed: 1000Lux Δ7EV Daylight Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed, and also zero shutter lag capability by showing edge acuity versus shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup over a series of images. All photos were taken at 1000 Lux with Daylight illuminant, 500 ms after blurring. In this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest spot and an 18% reflective gray spot is 7, which we denote by an exposure value difference of 7 The edge sharpness is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves graph and the shooting time is measured on the Universal Timer LED.
Framework
99
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
114
Oppo Find X5
Oppo Find X5
Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images taken in the lab as well as real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the light and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on map images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels for Tripod and Handheld Conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Retention of Detail score with lux level, for two sealing conditions. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-powered metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendition on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.
Noise
107
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
115
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture on real-life images and lab-captured graph images. For natural images, special attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on chart images captured under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The graph used is the dead leaves graph and standardized measurement such as visual noise derived from ISO 15739.
Evolution of visual noise with illuminance levels in portable conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with lux level under palmar conditions. The Visual Noise metric is the average of the Visual Noise measurement across all patches of the Dead Leaves graph in the AFHDR configuration. The SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.
Artifacts
77
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
81
Google Pixel 6
Google Pixel 6
Artifact assessment examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, ringing edges, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color tone shifts, among other types of possible effects unnatural on photos. The more serious and frequent the artifact, the greater the deduction of points from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding loss of points are listed below.
Major penalties for photographic artifacts
Preview
59
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
91
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
The preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app’s image preview, with particular attention to the difference between the capture and the preview, especially regarding the dynamic range and the application of the bokeh effect. The uniformity of exposure, color and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimum to the maximum available zoom factor is also evaluated. The preview frame rate is measured using the Universal Timer LED.
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon) – Preview – highlight crop
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon) – Capture – better dynamic range
Zoom in
133
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
151
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
About SBMARK Camera Zoom Tests
SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor, and low-light scenes using camera presets and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long zoom. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and by performing objective measurements of lab-captured map images under varying conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.
The Vivo X80 Pro offered decent performance when zooming in or out from the main camera. The super wide angle camera captured beautiful colors. When zoomed in using the camera, the images showed good texture and accurate exposure.
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon) Zoom Scores vs Ultra-Premium
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in focal length equivalent to 35 mm. Zoomed scores appear on the right and zoomed scores on the left.
Wide
102
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
117
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
These tests analyze the performance of the ultra wide angle camera at different focal lengths from 12mm to 20mm. All attributes of image quality are evaluated, with particular attention to artifacts such as chromatic aberrations, lens softness and distortion. The images below are an excerpt from the tested scenes.
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon) – good color rendering
Xiaomi 12S Ultra – anamorphosis on the edge of the frame
Honor Magic 4 Ultimate – good color rendition
tele
102
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
116
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40mm to 300mm, with an emphasis on texture and detail. The score comes from a series of objective laboratory measurements and perceptual analysis of real-life images.
SBMARK CHART Detail Retention Score (DMC) by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
SBMARK CHART Detail Retention Score (DMC) by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
SBMARK CHART Detail Retention Score (DMC) by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
SBMARK CHART Detail Retention Score (DMC) by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
video
133
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
149
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
About SBMARK Camera Video Tests
SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and low natural light scenes, indoors and out, using the camera’s default settings. Evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural video taken under various conditions and performing objective measurements on lab-recorded graph video under various conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.
In our tests, exposure and color were stable under all conditions in video clips from the Vivo X80 Pro. Also, the autofocus worked quickly and accurately in video mode. However, some luminance noise was visible in all conditions, and we observed some highlight clipping in high-contrast scenes.
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon) Video Scores vs Ultra-Premium
Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as still images, such as exposure, color, texture or noise, as well as temporal aspects such as speed, exposure uniformity and stability, white balance and autofocus transitions.
Exposure
102
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
115
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Color
96
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
117
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in light and dark areas of the image. The stability and temporal adaptation of the exposure are also analysed.
Image quality color analysis examines color rendition, skin tone rendition, white balance, color shading, white balance stability and its adaptation when the light changes.
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon) – fast and precise exposure adjustment
Xiaomi 12S Ultra – bright and vivid colors in most test conditions
Honor Magic 4 Ultimate – accurate colors in the interior
Framework
104
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
115
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real-life videos as well as graphics videos recorded in the lab. Natural video recordings are evaluated visually, with particular attention to the level of detail in bright areas and dark areas. Objective measurements of card images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux are performed. The charts used are the SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) video score for detail retention versus lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the video DMC detail retention score with the level of lux in the video. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-powered metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendition on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.
Noise
105
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
118
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture, temporal aspects on real-life video recording, as well as graph videos taken in the lab. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with an emphasis on noise in dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on graph videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graph used is the SBMARK visual noise graph.
Evolution of spatial visual noise with level of illumination
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with lux level. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise table in the video noise setup. The SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.
Time evolution of visual noise with level of illumination
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise over time with lux level. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise table in the video noise setup.
Stabilization
112
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
117
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
The stabilization rating tests the device’s ability to stabilize footage using software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any other means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, yellow artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running use cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt from one of the tested scenes.
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon) – effective video stabilization in all tested conditions
Xiaomi 12S Ultra: Some noticeable camera shake while running
Honor Magic 4 Ultimate: Some noticeable camera shake while running
Artifacts
81
Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
86
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR graph in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the Universal Timer LED. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying close attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and pitch shifting, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the more points will be deducted from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.
Top penalties for video artifacts
Start a new Thread