We put the Xiaomi 13T Pro through our rigorous SBMARK camera test suite to measure its performance in terms of photo, video and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article analyzes the behavior of the device in a series of tests and several common use cases and aims to highlight the most important results of our tests with an excerpt of the acquired data.

Overview

Key Camera Specifications:

  • Main: 50 MP 1/1.28″ sensor, 1.22 µm pixels, 24 mm equivalent f/1.9 aperture lens, OIS
  • Ultra-wide: 12MP 1/3.06″ sensor, 1.12µm pixels, 15mm-equivalent f/2.2 aperture lens
  • Tele: 50 MP 1/2.88″ sensor, 0.61 µm pixels, lens with f/1.9 aperture equivalent to 50 mm AF

Pros

  • Accurate exposure in different light conditions
  • Good noise control in photos and videos
  • Autofocus is generally fast and accurate for videos
  • Preservation of details in internal and external conditions

Against

  • Loss of detail in document images
  • Presence of artifacts in portrait mode
  • Slightly inaccurate rendering of the skin
  • Inaccurate color representation in night mode
  • Observable residual motion in outdoor walking scenarios

With an overall camera score of 131, the Xiaomi 13T Pro ranked 8 points higher than the Xiaomi 13T, even though both phones feature the same camera hardware. Differences in image quality were particularly visible in color rendition, in terms of white balance and skin tone rendition.

This year Xiaomi switched gears and equipped the 13T and 13T Pro lines with a Mediatek chipset, after several years of using Qualcomm chipsets for the T Pro lines. Specifically, the 13T Pro comes with the powerful MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ , while the standard 13T has the MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra.

Compared to the 12T Pro, its predecessor, the 13T Pro also scored a few more points in camera performance, thanks above all to photographic performance in which exposure, and especially noise and autofocus, showed significant improvements. Autofocus was generally perfect, and the 13T Pro managed to keep the main subject sharp. However, the main drawback of the device is the activation delay, which keeps the 13T Pro behind the best devices in this sector.

The 13T Pro’s video mode offers good motion stabilization, good color rendition in outdoor conditions, while keeping noise levels low in moving objects, making it an ideal camera for capturing travel and sports videos.

Test summary

About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK camera evaluations take place in laboratories and real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests whose results are calculated directly by the measurement software in our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of metrics allows a panel of imaging experts to compare aspects of image quality images that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, zoom and video quality are evaluated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras on different devices. For more information on the SBMARK camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section compiles key elements of SBMARK’s comprehensive testing and analysis. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us to find out how to receive a full report.

Xiaomi 13T Pro camera scores

This graph compares SBMARK photo, zoom, and video scores between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores of the price range are also indicated. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.

Photo

135

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

About SBMARK Camera Photo Tests

For scoring and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor, and low-light scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photography protocol is designed to take into account key use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portrait, family and landscape photography. Evaluation is performed by visually examining images Cons a natural scene reference and performing objective measurements on laboratory-captured graph images under varying lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

In our tests, the Xiaomi 13T Pro delivered images with good detail retention and low noise levels in bright light. The color rendering of the Xiaomi 13T Pro offers natural and vibrant colors, although the rendering of skin color may be slightly inaccurate in low light conditions. This device had good exposure and white balance stability in different lighting conditions, along with a wide dynamic range, resulting in good detail rendering in highly and low-lit areas of the image. Furthermore, the Xiaomi 13T Pro has less shading on the lenses than the Xiaomi 13T.

Xiaomi 13T Pro photo scores

Photography tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture and noise under various lighting conditions. Autofocus performance and the presence of artifacts are also evaluated on all images captured under controlled laboratory conditions and in real-life images. All of these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of images captured with the tested device and can help understand the camera’s key strengths and weaknesses.

Exposure

108

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

The Xiaomi 13T Pro showed high dynamic range in almost all tested conditions, except when the subject was moving in the scene, which made the HDR rendering rather unstable. The dynamic range was mostly on par with the Xioami 13T and showed slightly better results than the 12T Pro.

Entropy (ability to recover information in the highest parts of a scene) given for different illuminations and dynamics of the scene

As for the Xiaomi 12T Pro, some improvements were visible in low light conditions, with better target exposure leading to a more pleasant rendering.

Xiaomi 13T Pro – Low brightness

Xiaomi 13T Pro – Precise face exposure

Xiaomi 12T Pro – Low brightness

Xiaomi 12T Pro – Low face exposure

Xiaomi 13T – Accurate face exposure but skin tone is too pink

Color

103

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject across various use cases such as landscape, portrait or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when shooting multiple images of the same scene.
Regarding color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading and repeatability. Regarding color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of color signature.

The 13T Pro’s color rendition was generally pleasant although it struggled at times, especially in backlit scenes, with a visible red cast.

Xiaomi 13T Pro – Wide dynamic range

Xiaomi 13T Pro – Skin tone is slightly too red

Google Pixel 7a – Low dynamic range

Google Pixel 7a – Natural Skin Tone

Xiaomi 13T – Wide dynamic range

Xiaomi 13T – Low contrast and desaturated skin tone rendering

Auto focus

101

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag, and depth of field. Shutter delay is the difference between when the user presses the capture button and when the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the device’s ability to capture images at the right time, the so-called “zero shutter lag” capability. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for single-subject portraits or close-ups, it can also pose a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-world images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and low-light to outdoor conditions.

As for autofocus, the 13T Pro proved to be a very efficient device, managing to focus on its lens. However, the delay between activating the capture button and actual capture was often slightly too long: between 200 ms and 300 ms under all lighting conditions. It’s only a slight improvement over the 12T Pro, but it’s significant enough to make us miss the moment. For action-packed use cases like sports photography, this delay is slightly too long, which can easily mean missing the meaningful moment.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 20Lux Δ7EV Tungsten Handheld

This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability by showing edge sharpness versus shooting time measured with the AFHDR setup over a series of images. All photos were taken at 20Lux with tungsten illuminant, 500ms after blur. In this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and an 18% reflective gray area is 7, which we denote by an exposure value difference of 7 Edge sharpness is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves graph and shooting time is measured on the LED universal timer.

Structure

107

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images taken in the lab and in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the light and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on map images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The papers used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) paper and the Dead Leaves paper.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels for Tripod and Handheld Conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score with lux level, for two retention conditions. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the performance of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

101

Honor Magic5 Pro

Honor Magic5 Pro

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, texture on real-life images and on graph images taken in the laboratory. For natural images, particular attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on graph images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The graph used is the dead leaf graph and standardized measurement such as visual noise derived from ISO 15739.

Evolution of visual noise with illuminance levels under handheld conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with lux level in handheld conditions. The visual noise metric is the average of the visual noise measurement across all areas of the Dead Leaves graph in the AFHDR configuration. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Artifacts

73

XiaomiRedmi 12 5G

XiaomiRedmi 12 5G

Artifact evaluation examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, ringing edges, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected changes in color tone, among other types of possible unnatural effects on photo. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Major penalties for photography artifacts

Bokeh

70

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

With a bokeh score of 70, the 13T Pro ranks ahead of the 13T version. While both devices showed fairly similar quality in most conditions, the 13T Pro sometimes did slightly better in some very specific areas, but the quality gap between the devices was generally small.

Xiaomi 13T Pro – Depth estimate quite good

Xiaomi 13T – Depth estimation error

Preview

77

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Preview tests analyze the quality of the camera app’s image preview, with a focus on the difference between capture and preview, particularly regarding dynamic range and the application of bokeh. The smoothness of exposure, color and focus adaptation when switching from the minimum to the maximum available zoom factor is also evaluated. The preview frame rate is measured using the LED universal timer.

Xiaomi 13T Pro – Preview screen

Xiaomi 13T Pro – Exposure and dynamic range quite similar in the final shot compared to the preview

Zoom in

98

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

Learn about SBMARK camera zoom tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and in natural outdoor, indoor, and low-light scenes, using default camera settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide zoom to long range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually examining the images Cons a reference of natural scenes and performing objective measurements of map images captured in the laboratory under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

Zoom Xiaomi 13T Pro scores

This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in focal length equivalent to 35 mm. Zoomed scores appear on the right and zoomed scores appear on the left.

Wide

101

Huawei P60Pro

Huawei P60Pro

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths between approximately 40mm and 300mm, with particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a series of objective measurements in the laboratory and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

The Xiaomi 13T and Xiaomi 13T Pro both have the same camera modules, and the final render was generally very close most of the time. But the Xiaomi 13T’s rendering was slightly sharper.

Xiaomi 13T Pro – 90mm eq. focal length

Xiaomi 13T Pro – Fairly low level of detail

Xiaomi 13T – 90mm eq. focal length

Xiaomi 13T -Slightly better detail retention

Google Pixel 7a – 90mm eq. focal length

Google Pixel 7a – Low level of detail

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.

video

134

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

About SBMARK Camera Video Tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled laboratory environments and natural low-light scenes, indoors and outdoors, using default camera settings. The evaluation consists of visual inspection of natural videos taken under various conditions and performing objective measurements on videos of graphs recorded in the laboratory under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300 K to 6,500 K.

The Xiaomi 13T Pro was tested using the 4K HDR10+ format at 30 frames per second. Keep in mind that this is a different HDR format than the Xiaomi 13 Ultra, which offers the Dolby Vision HLG format.

In the video, the 13T Pro showed good detail retention and good exposure stability in the different lighting conditions tested: outdoors, indoors and in low light. The Xiaomi 13T Pro also had good noise control, even with moving objects or subjects. Autofocus was fast and accurate, while exposure was accurate in all lighting conditions. Overall in video mode, the quality of the Xiaomi 13T Pro was very similar to that of the Xiaomi 13T.

Xiaomi 13T Pro video scores

Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as still images, such as exposure, color, texture or noise, as well as temporal aspects such as speed, smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

97

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Color

99

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in both bright and dark areas of the image. The stability and temporal adaptation of the exposure are also analyzed.
Image quality color analysis examines color rendering, skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading, white balance stability and its adaptation when the light changes.

Videos from the Xiaomi 13T Pro showed stable white balance and decent color rendition. Color scores, however, were a bit disappointing for a camera tested in HDR format, with colors generally less vivid than those of the Xiaomi 12T Pro.

Disclaimer: The snapshots used in the illustrations below were obtained via BT. 2446a in order to appear in this review. Nonetheless, they illustrate well what has been observed on HDR displays.

Xiaomi 13T Pro – Color rendering slightly lacking in saturation

Xiaomi 13T – Color rendering slightly lacking in saturation

Xiaomi 12T Pro – Color rendering with vivid colors

Structure

115

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real videos and graphics videos recorded in the lab. Natural video footage is assessed visually, paying particular attention to the level of detail in bright and dark areas. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The cards used are SBMARK (DMC) card and Dead Leaves card.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) Video detail retention score versus lux levels

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention video score with the lux level in the video. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the performance of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

111

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real video recordings and on videos of graphs taken in the laboratory. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with particular attention to noise in dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on graph videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graph used is the SBMARK visual noise graph.

Evolution of spatial visual noise with illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with lux level. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setup. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Temporal evolution of visual noise with illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with lux level. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setup.

Stabilization

108

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

The stabilization rating checks the device’s ability to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS or any other means. The evaluation examines residual motion, smoothness, yellow artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running use cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt of one of the scenes tested.

Xaiomi 13T Pro – Residual walking motion and temporal clipping

Xiaomi 13T – Less residual movement and no temporal clipping

Xiaomi 12T Pro – Good stability and slight clipping of the lights

Disclaimer: Videos on Xiaomi 13T Pro and 13T were recorded using the device’s HDR10+ format. YouTube does not detect Xiaomi’s implementation of HDR10+ and automatically converts videos to SDR, which may result in a loss of detail in the final images. As a result, please note that videos in this review may not reflect the HDR quality tested.

Artifacts

81

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR graph in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the LED universal timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the deduction of points from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Top penalties for video artifacts

Let's talk about "Xiaomi 13T Pro Camera test" with our community!
Start a new Thread

Philip Owell

Professional blogger, here to bring you new and interesting content every time you visit our blog.